Through her contact with the city man what does O’keeffe discover about how she herself wants to paint

Through her contact with “the city man” what does O’keeffe discover about how she herself wants to paint

wk11 optional spss general social surgery set


  • Review Chapters 10 and 11 of the Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero course text and the media program found in this week’s Learning Resources related to bivariate categorical tests.
  • Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered using categorical analysis.

Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following:

  1. What is your research question?
  2. What is the null hypothesis for your question?
  3. What research design would align with this question?
  4. What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?
  5. What independent variable is used and how is it measured?
  6. If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?
  7. Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.

What advantages would a physician have by accepting a capitation rate from a managed care plan

Question details:

1, What advantages would a physician have by accepting a capitation rate from a managed care plan? What would be the disadvantages? 300 words with reference

2. What has been the effect of DRGs on hospital admissions and length of stay? What are some advantages and disadvantages of DRGs?

300 words with reference APA formart.

strategic position

strategic position
You have been appointed as a new main Board Director of a global advertising and marketing communications group of companies, the WRSX gROUP.Your job director of wrsx companies is the long term direction of the bussiness.Before you can begin to make choice about the

 
Express the expectation and the purpose
Analyse its strategic capability

research methods in psychology 1

As a counselor, you will be making decisions on how to select evidence-based treatments. In your essay, demonstrate the decision-making process that you will use to choose one evidence-based treatment over another. Write a 1,000-1,250-word reflection essay on how to effectively utilize research in order to guide decision-making processes in the counseling profession. Include the following in your essay

  1. A discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process.
  2. A discussion about the key characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research. How do these characteristics guide the decision-making processes?
  3. Select a diagnosis and include an example of how research could assist in treatment.
  4. Include a minimum of three scholarly resources in addition to the course textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Qualitative and Quantitative Research Reports

Reflection does not include a discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process. Reflection does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Reflection only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process. Reflection demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a basic discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process. Reflection demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a thorough discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process. Reflection provides examples to further understanding. Reflection demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Reflection provides a comprehensive discussion about how qualitative and quantitative research reports guide the decision-making process. In addition, it explains how these methods of research might be helpful in their career as a professional counselor. Reflection demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

25.0 %Characteristics of Effective Writing and Publication in Counseling and Psychological Research C4.2 Utilize research to guide decision-making processes.

Reflection does not include a discussion about the characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research and how these guide the decision-making process. Reflection does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Reflection only vaguely or incompletely includes a discussion about the characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research and how these guide the decision-making process. Reflection demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a basic discussion about the characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research and how these guide the decision-making process. Reflection demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a thorough discussion about the characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research and how these guide the decision-making process. Reflection demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Reflection provides a comprehensive discussion about the characteristics of effective writing and publication in counseling and psychological research and how these guide the decision-making process. In addition, it explains how these methods of research might be helpful in their career as a professional counselor. Reflection demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

25.0 %Diagnosis and Example

Reflection does not include a diagnosis as well as an example of how research can assist in treatment. Reflection does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Reflection only vaguely or incompletely includes a diagnosis as well as an example of how research can assist in treatment. Reflection demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a basic discussion about a diagnosis as well as an example of how research can assist in treatment. Reflection demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Reflection provides a thorough discussion about a diagnosis as well as an example of how research can assist in treatment. Reflection demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.

Reflection provides a comprehensive discussion about a diagnosis as well as an example of how research can assist in treatment. Reflection demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

15.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Two-year ban for ‘erotic’ therapist ,

Two-year ban for ‘erotic’ therapist

,
?

Boundaries crossed … Joe Levonian’s research into anorgasmia was a ”personal interest”. Photo: Domino Postiglione
A HYPNOTHERAPIST has been banned from practising for two years after using ”erotic techniques” to treat a woman’s smoking aIDiction then having sex with her.
Joe Levonian, of Balgowlah, was also ”reckless” in giving two other women sexual massages as part of his personal research project into anorgasmia, as the inability to orgasm is termed.
The Health Care Complaints Commission found Mr Levonian ”displayed little appreciation of the importance in maintaining appropriate professional boundaries” and would pose a risk to the public if allowed to continue unsupervised.
The commission received a complaint last May about Mr Levonian’s erotic hypnotherapy from a woman who wanted to quit smoking.
Advertisement

In her evidence, the woman, identified as Client A, said that during a hypnosis session in his office Mr Levonian had placed his hand on her breast while repeating the words: ”You are getting more and more aroused.”
At their fifth session, Mr Levonian said she looked tense and needed a massage. The commission’s report said: ”Client A stated that during the massage, when she was lying on her front with her eyes closed, the massage became sensual. When she turned over, she saw that Mr Levonian had started taking off his pants and they engaged in consensual sexual intercourse.”
Two days later, the pair met at a cafe where Client A said she was struggling emotionally. She said Mr Levonian had agreed to report himself to the Australian Hypnotherapists’ Association.
”Mr Levonian told the commission he felt ‘guilty’, ‘remorseful’ and ‘immediately knew he had done the wrong thing’ and ‘crossed the professional boundary’ … Client A said she felt manipulated and violated by the event,” the commissioner, Kieran Pehm, said in his decision.
In investigating her complaint, the commission became aware of Mr Levonian’s research project into anorgasmia and contacted two women, cousins, who had agreed to take part, consenting to have their genitals, anuses and breasts touched by the hypnotist. One woman said she had left the treatment room and never returned once she became aware Mr Levonian had removed his pants and was leaning against her in silky boxer shorts. Mr Levonian claimed they were football shorts.
Mr Pehm said Mr Levonian had no approval to conduct research by any recognised body and the only basis for the research was ”his own personal interest”.
”Mr Levonian was, at the very least, reckless to proceed with his project without satisfying himself and others to its legitimacy,” Mr Pehm found. ”What happened during Mr Levonian’s session with Client B and C was highly sexual in content and it does not appear [he] could possibly have separated his own personal interests and remain detached while this was going on.”
Mr Levonian, who is training as a nurse, must not provide hypnotherapy, treat any sexual dysfunctions or conduct any research involving humans without the approval of a human research ethics committee for two years.
In a statement, Mr Levonian’s solicitor, Claire Mallon said: ”At the time of the matters in question, Mr Levonian was suffering from severe reactive depression … He is extremely remorseful for his temporary errors of judgment.”

The case study is to include:
*
* An introduction ?
* A summary of the above case and its context .?
* A detailed analysis of the social, legal, ethical and/or professional issues involved in this situation, making reference to your research in the area ?
* An outline of appropriate professional and legal responses to the case study, based on relevant codes of ethics, professional standards and legislation
*
PACFA sets high standards of ethical conduct for the counselling and psychotherapy profession. This supports the ethical practice of counsellors and psychotherapists and helps to protect the public form harm.
Practitioners registered with PACFA are required to abide by the Interim Code of Ethics 2015 and the Codes of Ethics of any PACFA Member Associations to which they belong. PACFA Member Associations are required to abide by the Code of Good Governance.
PACFA and it Member Associations operate complaints handling processes for situations where there are concerns that the required standards of ethics have not been met. The complaints system holds practitioners accountable for any breaches of the relevant Codes of Ethics.
For information on how to make a complaint, go to the Complaints page. All complaints are heard in accordance with PACFA’s Professional Conduct Procedures.
PACFA’s ethical standards are implemented and reviewed by the PACFA Ethics Committee. For more information about the work of the Ethics Committee, go to the Ethics Committee page.
PACFA also provides training in ethics and ethical practice to support practitioners and to maintain high ethical standards. For details see the Ethics Training page.
Overview of PACFA Code of Ethics
The PACFA Code of Ethics establishes minimum standards of ethical practice for Counsellors and Psychotherapists for the information and protection of those using their services. Below are some of the key principles and responsibilities set out in the Code. For full details, you can download the Interim Code of Ethics 2015.

Ethical Principles
* Counsellors respect the essential humanity, worth and dignity of all people and promote this value in their work.
* Counsellors recognise and respect diversity among people and oppose discrimination and oppressive behaviour.
* Counsellors respect the privacy of their clients and preserve the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of their work.
* Counsellors protect the rights of their clients including the right to informed consent.
* Counsellors take steps to maintain and develop their competence throughout their professional lives.
* Counsellors abide by the laws of the society in which they practice.
Ethical Responsibilities
* Counsellors take all reasonable steps to avoid harm to their clients as a result of the counselling process.
* Counsellors faced with situations which extend the boundary of their competence seek supervision and consider referral to other professionals.
* In the event of harm resulting from Counselling, Counsellors take responsibility for restitution.
* Counsellors promote client autonomy and encourage clients to make responsible decisions on their own behalf.
* Counsellors consider the social context of their clients and their connections to others.
* Counsellors are responsible for setting and maintaining professional boundaries within the Counselling relationship.
Exploitation
* Counsellors must not exploit clients, past or present, in financial, sexual, emotional or any other way.
* Counsellors will not accept or offer payments for referrals, or engage in any financial transactions, apart from negotiating the ordinary fee charged for Counselling.
* Sexual relations between the client and the Counsellor can never be acceptable and constitute unethical behaviour. This is not restricted to sexual intercourse and includes any form of physical contact, whether initiated by the client or the Counsellor, which has as its purpose some form of sexual gratification, or which may be reasonably construed as having that purpose.
* Counsellors should consider that the deeper the involvement with the client’s emotional life during Counselling, the less likely is the possibility of a subsequent equal relationship following termination of therapy. Counsellors must seek professional supervision should any attempt to build a relationship with a former client be considered.
Confidentiality
* Counsellors treat with confidence any personal information about clients, whether obtained directly or by inference. This applies to all verbal, written, recorded or computer stored material pertaining to the therapeutic context. All records, whether in written or any other form, need to be protected with the strictest of confidence.
* Clients must not be observed by anyone other than their Counsellors without having given informed consent. This applies both to direct observation and to any form of audio or visual transmission or recording.
* Counsellors and Supervisors are responsible for protecting the client’s rights of confidentiality in the supervisory context by ensuring that shared information is disguised appropriately.
* Exceptional circumstances may arise which give the Counsellor good grounds for believing that the client will cause serious physical harm to others or themselves. In such circumstances, the breaking of confidentiality may be required, preferably with the client’s permission, or after consultation with a Counselling Supervisor.
* Any breaking of confidentiality should be minimized both by restricting the information conveyed to that which is pertinent to the immediate situation and by limiting it to those persons who can provide the help required by the client.
* Agreements about confidentiality continue after the client’s death unless there are overriding legal considerations.?Special care is required when using specific Counselling situations for reports and publication. The author must have the client’s informed consent should there be any possibility of identification of the client.
Contracts
* Counselling activities are to be undertaken only with professional intent and not casually and/or in extra professional relationships.
* Contracts involving the client should be realistic and clear.
* When a client is incapable of giving informed consent, Counsellors obtain consent from a legally authorised person.
* Any publicity material and all written and oral information should reflect accurately the nature of the service offered and the training, qualifications and relevant experience of the Counsellor.
* Counsellors are responsible for communicating the terms on which Counselling is being offered.
* Counsellors will disclose any conflict of interest which may arise in relation to a client and will seek supervision to resolve appropriate action which may include referral.

what is the rationale for the implementation of case management services within the community health center inc

Overview: For the capstone assessment, you will create a business implementation plan and audiovisual presentation for the product, service, or idea you have been developing throughout your MBA coursework. In Milestone One, you will submit the justification for your idea or concept. You will connect entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship with organization change and survival. This milestone lays the foundation for the rest of the project by outlining the justification of an idea or concept. Ultimately, the justification in this milestone will provide much of the reasoning that decision makers will use to determine if they will fund your idea or concept. Critical Elements:  Rationale: Lay out the rationale for the idea or concept.  Problem or Opportunity: Identify the problem or opportunity that the idea or concept addresses.  Market: Analyze the market for the product or service.  Competition: Analyze the key features that set the product or service apart from the competition.  Company: Explain how the concept fits with the mission, vision, and priorities of the company implementing the product or service.  Innovation: Discuss how or why the product or service is innovative. Guidelines for Submission: Your draft must contain all of the elements listed above. It should be 5 to 8 pages in length (excluding the title page and references) using 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins. You may include summary pictures, charts, graphs, or other explanatory diagrams as needed to successfully explain the concept and implementation, but should use appendices for detailed supporting documentation. Your paper should follow APA guidelines. You must include at least 5 scholarly sources. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Not Proficient (0%) Value Main Elements Includes most of the main elements Does not include any of the main elements 15 Critical Thinking Provides logical conclusions and defends with examples Does not provide logical conclusions 15 Rationale Provides rationale and thoroughly defends it Does not provide rationale 10 Problem or Opportunity Identifies the problem or opportunity and includes a detailed description of how the idea or concept addresses the problem or opportunity Does not discuss the problem or opportunity 10 Market Analyzes the market for the product or service and quantifies market size Does not analyze market for product or service 10 Competition Analyzes key features, outlines how these meet unmet customer needs, and explains how the key features set the product or service apart from the competition Does not provide key features 10 Company Explains how the concept fits with the mission, vision, and priorities of the company implementing the product or service, and connects this information with long term organizational strategy Does not explain how concept fits with the mission, vision, and priorities of the company implementing the product or service 10 Innovation Discusses how or why the product is innovative and situates the product or service within the implementing company’s larger product or service portfolio Does not discuss how the concept or idea is innovative 10 Articulation of Response Submission does not have critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total

What Would You Do?

What Would You Do?

Order Description

The Corporate Culture
Read Decision Point: What Would You Do?
Choose one of the following companies (or any company that has been in the press) and write a page, APA style critical analysis of the ethical issues involved in the case.
Legal Cases:
• Tyco
• Imclone
• Global Crossing
• WorldCom
• Adelphia
• NYSE and Richard Grasso
• Merrill Lynch
• Health South
• Marsh and McLennan
• Al Dunlap and Sunbeam
The analysis should include the following:
• A short description of case
• identification of the ethical issues involved (what was the alleged ethical wrong done, and why is/was it wrong?)
• A statement, in their own opinion, of whether it was wrong or not, and more importantly, why?
• Thoughts on what could have been done to avoid the problem – do we need more laws & government regulation? What internal controls might have prevented this situation?
• Was the problem more a matter of individuals gone wrong, or was it more systemic and organizational?
Provide 3-5 APA style references both inline and at the end of the paper to support your analysis. Please write in 3rd person. Note: This is your opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of the week’s theory linked to personal opinion and outside evidence.
Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Please include citations to support your ideas.
Required Text
Hartman, L. P., and J. DesJardins. Business ethics: Decision making for personal integrity and social responsibility. 2. New York, NY: McGraw-Hll, 2011. Print.
ISBN: 9781121821040

Social issues

. For this assignment, you will select a topic suitable for an argumentative essay about a social issue, then write an informative paper about the topic.  You will provide an objective overview of the different sides and angles to the topic. For example, if you were to write about abortion, you would summarize and explain the arguments in favor of keeping abortion legal, those arguments opposed to keeping it legal, and any arguments that fall in between. Depending on your topic, you may need to provide some necessary history/background in order to understand the issue completely.

Keep in mind that your argumentative paper will ask you to think about your topic in terms of policy, so it will behoove you to approach this essay in the same way. For example, Intelligent design is the best theory explaining the creation of the universe, is not an acceptable thesis for your argumentative paper, but Intelligent design should be taught in biology classes is. For that reason, your Understanding an Issue paper should approach the topic in a similar fashion.

Topics are open, but please be aware that not all argumentative paper topics are created equal. Some topics lend themselves to misinformation and sloppy research — I see this problem most often with abortion and obesity, so tread carefully if you choose either of those topics, and make sure you are pulling from reliable sources. Gun control, universal health care, immigration, and capital punishment have similar issues, although they are not as pronounced.

I would suggest choosing a topic that interests you, but this assignment may be difficult to complete if you choose an issue you feel extremely passionate about, particularly if you have trouble seeing the opposing side’s view. Please keep that in mind when choosing a topic.

What do you feel are the biggest weaknesses of the health care plan, and why?

In 2010, the United States passed landmark health care legislation when President Obamas health care plan passed in the U.S. Congress. However, despite its promise to provide health care coverage for a number of groups previously unable to obtain coverage, many Americans are dissatisfied with the components of the plan.Thinking in terms of the administrator and third-party payer perspectives, answer the following:
What do you feel are the biggest weaknesses of the health care plan, and why?
Be sure to provide 23 weaknesses for each group (i.e. providers and patients), and explain your rationale for choosing each by supporting your thoughts with properly cited references.